Up
and
down
(that pause)
up again
Suspended in the nothing-moment between trajectories, I watch my understanding scatter. Everyone thinks bouncing is about the rise, the triumphant surge toward sky. They're wrong. It's about the cusp. The weightlessness before descent. The surrender.
I'm a bouncer.
Not the kind with crossed arms and clipboard judgment, though that too requires a certain rhythm of admission and denial. No, I mean I bounce. I go up. I come down. I do it again until something breaks or reveals itself or both.
The body knows before the mind does.
Three inches from ceiling and trapped in that half-second hover, I see how we've tricked ourselves. We call that fleeting micro-suspension "apex," implying it holds some privilege over the rest of the cycle. But there is no hierarchy in bounce-time. No destination to privileged understanding. Only the system of pressures, releases, tensions, surrenders.
Bounce rhythm is backbrain logic. Soul logic. Chaos-pattern logic.
"Man's search for meaning," Frankl called it. But that implies meaning exists to be found, somewhere out there, static. Waiting. Sometimes I think a more honest framing might be: "Man's bounce toward meaning." The act itself creates what we pretend to discover.
Up
and
down
(that pause)
up again
What are we to make of the obvious fact that our lives, our minds, our societies make no coherent sense by conventional reason? Psychiatrists reach for chemical imbalances, politicians for broken systems, spiritualists for deeper truths. Each offers a stationary understanding, a firm ground. A promise that if we would just stop bouncing, the blur would resolve to clarity.
And yet.
The blur itself contains information that stillness cannot access.
Deleuze might call this difference and repetition, finding the inherent difference within each seemingly identical cycle. Each bounce is not the same bounce. The pattern performs illusion through faithful reproduction plus microscopic variance. I learn things bouncing that I cannot learn sitting still, thinking straight.
"But what good is knowledge that cannot be articulated?" ask the serious people with briefcases and tenure and metrics.
I don't know. What good is staying still in a universe built on motion? What meaning does fixity hold in the quantum dance?
Up
and
down
(that pause)
up again
Sometimes I suspect the bounce is escape. From responsibility, from groundedness, from the need to arrive at conclusions. A perpetual adolescence of understanding. Refusing to arrive.
Other times, I'm convinced the bounce is the only form of presence honest enough to meet reality on its own terms. Complex systems don't yield to linear analysis. The mind doesn't yield to rational excavation. So why should our method of engagement pretend otherwise?
The trampoline fabric distorts under weight then reconstitutes itself. Each bounce leaves traces on material memory, subtle shifts in tension. The distributed web remembers what happened without keeping records. Body knowledge. Mesh knowledge. Bouncer knowledge.
I watch myself break apart and reassemble, seventy times per minute.
Winnicott wrote of a "transitional space" where play creates a bridge between inner reality and external world. But a bridge implies connection between two solid things. Bounce-space reveals there was never solidity to begin with. Only varying densities of motion. Play isn't connection; play is recognition of perpetual disconnection and jumping into it anyway.
Up
and
down
(that pause)
up again
Sensemaking without sense is the most honest divination. Noticing patterns without forcing patterns. Letting contradiction and tension exist without resolution. The sense emerges not through systematic accumulation of evidence but through embodied oscillation.
I'm a bouncer in a fractured casino. The house doesn't win. The players don't win. The system keeps moving. The meaning keeps moving.
Look too directly at the pattern and it dissolves. Watch it from peripheral vision and suddenly a structure emerges. Like those magic-eye posters from the 90s. You have to unfocus to see clearly.
"The capacity to be absurd is the capacity to comprehend infinity," wrote somebody, somewhere, probably.
Up
and
down
(that pause)
up again
They'll tell you it's childish. A failure to grow up. To arrive. To commit.
Maybe.
But what if the trampoline is the meeting place of incompatible truths? What if bounce-rhythm is the only possible integration of contradictions that can't be integrated through reason?
What if adult understanding isn't arriving somewhere but learning to stay in motion without falling?
I'm no closer to knowing. And that's precisely the point.
I can't tell you what I learn while bouncing because the knowledge exists in the motion, not apart from it. Translation loses everything. Like trying to explain a joke. Like parsing a poem. Like freezing a wave to study its flow.
There's a collapse of coherence that feels like sanity. A dispersal of certainty that feels like clarity.
The systems theorists tell us complex patterns arise spontaneously from simple rules. Bouncing is one rule: gravity plus resistance plus trajectory. But look what happens inside it, a universe of orientations.
Up
and
down
(that pause)
up again
In that suspension, that brief anti-gravity pocket, I understand it all for a moment. Then forget it on the descent. Not because the understanding wasn't real, but because it exists only in that specific relationship between forces.
Camus might say the bounce is absurd response to an absurd universe. A rebellion against gravity that never succeeds, yet never ceases.
I am Sisyphus on a trampoline.
The difference is, I'm not trying to get anywhere. Not trying to reach the top of the mountain. Not trying to escape the punishment. I'm noticing what happens in the pattern.
Up
and
down
(that pause where everything makes sense)
up......